Do radiometric dating problems
One is the Carbon-14 system used for dating fragments of once-living organisms.It's never used for non-organic samples, and almost never even attempted if the sample is thought to be much older than about 50,000 years.Between 19 several teams made a number of radiometric measurements, and the results clustered around three ages-1.8 MY, 2.4 MY, and 2.6 MY.
Leakey declared that the skull was 2.9 MY, and said that it "fits no previous models of human beginnings." It was named KNM-ER-1470 (for Kenya National Museum, East Rudolf, #1470).Most people, even the experts in the field, forget the assumptions on which radiometric dating is based.Radioactive Dating There are basically two different kinds of radioactive dating methods.They covered "expected" ages ranging from 1 to 600 million years.In almost every case of a discrepancy, the fossil dates were accepted as correct. Woodmorappe quoted one researcher as saying: In general, dates in the 'correct ball park' are assumed to be correct and are published, but those in disagreement with other data are seldom published nor are discrepancies fully explained.2 When these reports did discuss the possible causes of errors, they used words such as "possibly," "perhaps," "probably," "may have been," etc.
Search for do radiometric dating problems:
And, of course, the public doesn't usually hear of these wrong answers.